Skip to content

Applications

Explore the key challenges in modern offshore drilling and see how Enhanced Drilling’s solutions help operators improve performance, reduce risk, and enhance well integrity.

Pressure Management
Staying within the window
Well Completion
Finishing strong – safely and productively..
Deepwater & Ultra-Deepwater
More depth. More risk. More need for control.

Precision Tools That Enable Safer, Smarter Wells

Our technologies are categorized by drilling phase – helping you find the right solution faster.

Well Diagram - Top Hole Section

Top-Hole Section

Technologies
Help you drill faster, cleaner, and safer from day one — while protecting the environment and reducing risk in the most fragile part of the well.
Well Diagram - Intermediate Section

Intermediate section

Technologies
Helps you drill deeper with fewer casing strings, improved stability, and better safety — even in narrow pressure windows.
Well Diagram - Reservoir & Completion Section

Reservoir and Completion

Technologies
Helps maximize production rates, protect the reservoir, and simplify completion — even in depleted zones or challenging formations.

CCS vs SBP vs CML: A Comparison of Managed Pressure Drilling Methods

Choosing the right Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) method can have a major impact on well control, operational efficiency and overall drilling performance.

Written by Snorre Lutnes

Snorre is a Technical Sales Manager at Enhanced Drilling, bringing with him 20 years of experience in the drilling industry, with a strong focus on drilling fluids and MPD.

He began his career offshore as a mud engineer before transitioning into project management roles onshore. After spending a decade working internationally, Snorre has returned to Norway, shifting his focus from operational responsibilities to a more specialized role in technical sales. 

In this guide, we compare three of the most widely used MPD methods

  • Continuous Circulation Systems (CCS) 

  • Surface Back Pressure (SBP)

  • Controlled Mud Level (CML)

You will learn how the three methods differ in terms of pressure control, operational use, well monitoring and rig time.

This comparison is designed for drilling engineers, well engineers and technical advisors who need to evaluate which MPD method is most suitable for their wells, environments and operational challenges.

Quick overview of the three MPD methods

Managed Pressure Drilling methods aim to maintain constant bottom hole pressure (CBHP) in the well. However, CCS, SBP and CML achieve this in very different ways. 

CCS
Main Principle

Continuous circulation 

Typical strengths

Stable ECD and improved hole cleaning

SBP
Main Principle

Surface back pressure via choke 

Typical strengths

Influx management and riser gas handling 

CML
Main Principle

Controlled mud level in riser 

Typical strengths

Dual gradient effect and improved monitoring 

 

Each method creates a different pressure profile and is therefore suited for different well conditions and operational scenarios.

The following sections explain how each method works and when it is typically used.

Frequently asked questions about MPD methods

To help you get even more value from this guide, these FAQs highlight the questions we most often receive from drilling professionals. They provide quick clarifications on key points so you can apply the insights more effectively to your own operations.

What is the main difference in how CCS, SBP and CML control bottom hole pressure? CCS keeps circulation going during connections using a circulation sub and hose on each stand, creating a near-constant ECD along the annulus in both static and dynamic conditions.

SBP uses a surface choke and RCD to apply backpressure at surface, anchoring CBHP at a given depth; static and dynamic pressure profiles diverge more the further you move from that anchor point, with higher static pressure above and lower below.

CML adjusts the riser fluid level to control bottom hole pressure, creating a profile with lower pressure at shallow depths and higher deeper in the section, which can be advantageous when the shoe is the weak point.
Where can each method be used in terms of environment, rig type and well sections?

CCS is applicable on land, shallow water and deepwater, on all rig types, and can be used in all well sections.

SBP can also be used in all environments and on all rig types, but is more limited in shallow and large-diameter sections because of the pressure profile and cuttings load, and may require high backpressure in deep, long horizontals.

CML cannot be used on land or fixed installations; it is for floaters with a subsea BOP, is widely used across sections in deepwater, and can exploit dual-gradient effects in upper sections.

How do CCS, SBP and CML differ during key operations like drilling, tripping, cementing and completion?

CCS provides continuous circulation while drilling and during connections, which improves hole cleaning and keeps CBHP stable, but it does not offer managed pressure cementing or MPD-style completion operations and requires displacements between drilling and tripping fluids.

SBP manages CBHP by ramping pumps and backpressure during connections, can support Managed Pressure Cementing by displacing to lower-density fluids with applied backpressure, and can be used for certain completion and open-hole gravel-pack operations with adapted assemblies.

CML adjusts riser level instead of backpressure, uses riser-level control during drilling, tripping and completion, supports MPC by stepping riser level down as cement rises, and is particularly strong for managed pressure gravel-pack operations.

Which method offers the strongest capabilities for well monitoring, EKLD and influx management?

CCS benefits from non-stop circulation, giving a clean signal through the mass-flow meter and enabling EKLD in single-phase return flow, but relies on conventional well control if an influx is taken.

SBP uses a mass-flow meter and surface circulation loop to maintain EKLD even in non-circulating phases, and can actively manage and circulate out an influx up to a predefined size, including riser gas handling.

CML uses subsea riser pressure sensors and can treat the riser as an active pit, removing uncertainties from flowline volume and rig motion and delivering very accurate EKLD, but influx management remains conventional unless combined with a riser closure device.

How do CCS, SBP and CML impact rig time and operational efficiency?

CCS has a small footprint and minimal rig-up time, but requires repeated hose handling on the floor during connections and displacements between drilling and tripping fluids.

SBP has the heaviest rig-time impact: more extensive rig-up (RCD, choke and buffer manifolds, extra lines), fingerprinting, running and retrieving the RCD every trip, and time-consuming displacements in narrow windows, particularly when combining MPD with cementing.

CML typically requires a few hours to install the subsea pump module but then optimizes tripping by avoiding displacements, allowing faster conditioning and MPC operations at higher flow rates in narrow annuli, and generally reducing flat time compared to SBP.

What are the key limitations of each method I should keep in mind when selecting a solution?

CCS is simple, with a small footprint and excellent pressure profile and hole cleaning, but it is limited in scope: no MPC, no completion or wireline applications, and a strong dependency on displacements.

SBP is versatile in terms of influx management, riser gas handling and special applications like PMCD and wireline under MPD, but comes with a less favourable pressure profile at the shoe, more flat time, more equipment and operational complexity, and potential constraints in shallow or large-hole sections.

CML is user-friendly, versatile in deepwater operations, speeds up tripping, avoids many displacements and provides high-fidelity monitoring and EKLD, but it is restricted to floaters with subsea BOPs, cannot be used on land or fixed installations, and still relies on conventional well control unless paired with a riser closure device.

Executive summary

The three most common Managed Pressure Drilling methods are:

  • Continuous Circulation Systems (CCS)

  • Surface Back Pressure (SBP)

  • Controlled Mud Level (CML).

All three methods aim to maintain constant bottom hole pressure (CBHP), but they do so in different ways and create different pressure profiles in the well.

These differences affect:

  • well control capability

  • operational flexibility

  • rig time

  • monitoring accuracy

  • applicability across environments and well sections 

Understanding these differences is essential when selecting the most suitable MPD method for a specific drilling operation.

For operators evaluating how CML and SBP can be combined in one flexible system, explore EC-Drill® Dual MPD. 

 

Reflection of two offshore workers in safety gear standing on platform equipment.

How do they operate?

CCS

The CCS method enables circulation during connections. This is typically achieved by using a sub on top of each drill string stand. After the stand is drilled down, a hose is connected to the sub providing flow down the drillstring during the connection. The CCS method achieves a near constant Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) profile in the well for circulating and non-circulating operations.

The common drilling approach for CCS is using a lower fluid density to create the desired ECD profile, ensuring this is maintained by continuously pumping down the drillstring

 

SBP 

The SBP method uses a surface choke to apply back-pressure on the well. To create a closed-loop system, a Rotating Control Device (RCD) seals around the drillpipe in the well, with a dedicated return line leading back to the flowline.

A common drilling approach for SBP is using a lower fluid density to create the desired ECD profile and then compensate for the lack of friction during non-circulating events by applying pressure using the surface choke.

 

CML

The Controlled Mud Level method controls bottom hole pressure by adjusting the mud level inside the marine riser.

By raising or lowering the mud level, operators can directly control the hydrostatic pressure in the well. This allows CML to create a dual gradient pressure profile, which can reduce pressure at shallow depths while maintaining sufficient pressure deeper in the well.

This pressure profile is particularly beneficial in deepwater wells where the casing shoe is often the weakest point.

More insight: EC-Drill® Managed Pressure Drilling System 

 

Bottom hole pressure

Each MPD method controls bottom hole pressure differently, creating distinct pressure profiles in the well. These pressure profiles strongly influence where the methods can be used and which operational challenges they can address. 

CCS

The pressure profile created by CCS is the most consistent across the annulus. From the shoe down to the bit, the profile is a near constant
ECD profile. The only minor fluctuation in pressure occur due to the non-rotating pipe during connections. Unlike the other methods, CCS operates without an anchor point for CBHP, resulting in no significant deviations between static and dynamic conditions above or below any points in the well.

 

SBP

The pressure profile created by SBP generates higher pressure at shallow depths. This profile can be beneficial if there is a high-pressure zone below the Shoe and lower formation pressure further down in the section. The dynamic and static pressure profiles deviate more from each other the further away from the anchor point you go. The static pressure profile will always be higher above the anchor point and lower below the anchor point whereas the dynamic pressure profile will be lower above the anchor point and higher below the anchor point.

 

CML

Conversely to SBP, the pressure profile created by CML generates lower pressure at shallow depths. This profile can be beneficial if the Shoe is the weak point with higher formation pressure further down in the section. As with SBP, the dynamic and static pressure profiles deviate more from each other the further away from the anchor point you go. Generally, both static and dynamic pressure profiles are lower above the anchor point and higher below it.

Proof in action: Case study on Dual Gradient effect in Gulf of Mexico deepwater  

Enhanced Drilling engineer in safety gear inspecting equipment inside the workshop.

Usage areas

The applicability of CCS, SBP and CML depends on:

  • drilling environment

  • rig type

  • well section

  • pressure window

The following sections outline the typical environments and well types where each method is used.

On-Demand Webinar: Introducing EC-Drill® Dual MPD 

Land, shallow water and deep water

CCS

CCS can be used in all environments.

SBP

SBP can be used in all environments.

CML

CML cannot be used on land. It can be used in shallow waters with limited ability to adjust the fluid column.

Read more: See where CML is most applicable 

Types of rigs

CCS

CCS can be used on all types of rigs.

SBP

CCS can be used on all types of rigs.

CML

CML can be used on floaters only with a subsea BOP.

 

Well sections

CCS

CCS can be used for all sections of a well.

SBP

SBP is limited at shallow depths due the pressure profile crated by the applied backpressure. Large hole sections are a limitation because of the amount and size of cuttings even with a Junk catcher installed. Deep and long horizontal sections require a high amount of back pressure.

CML

CML is frequently used for all sections of a well. Upper sections in deepwater wells are commonly combined by benefiting from the
Dual Gradient Effect. Deep and long horizontal sections require a large adjustment of the riser level.

Operations

The standard operations while drilling and completing a well are covered in this section, highlighting how each of the three MPD methods approaches these tasks.

Drilling

CCS

CCS maintains a near CBHP and generate the same pressure profiles during static and dynamic conditions through the continuous circulation. The nonstop circulation also improves the hole cleaning. To adjust the BHP the flowrate is changed.


SBP

During connections, the mud pumps are gradually ramped down while applying backpressure to maintain a CBHP. Once the connection is completed, the pumps are gradually ramped up while the backpressure is reduced. To increase the BHP, backpressure can be applied when drilling (and extra pressure applied during connections). To reduce the BHP, it must be planned beforehand by drilling with applied backpressure.

Read more: Pros and cons of CML vs SBP  


CML

In CML operations, the mud pumps are ramped down during connections, while the Riser level is increased to maintain a CBHP. Once the connection is completed, the pumps are ramped up while the Riser level is lowered. To adjust the BHP the riser level is changed.

Run in hole

CCS

CCS does not facilitate Casing or Liner runs. When running drillpipe it is possible to pump while tripping and adjust the flowrate to mitigate the surge effect.

 

SBP

It is possible to strip into the well with the applied backpressure adjusted to mitigate the surge effect. However, SBP cannot adjust BHP for running casings, liners longer than the water depth, or in areas where active BOP use is restricted.

 

CML

While running in hole, the BHP is maintained by lowering the riser level to mitigate the surge effect.

Cementing

CCS

CCS does not offer Managed Pressure Cementing (MPC).

 

SBP

MPC is performed by first displacing the well to a fluid with lower density while applying surface back pressure to maintain the BHP. This is provided the Shoe can handle the increased pressure. When the higher density cement slurry goes up the annulus, the applied backpressure is gradually reduced to maintain the BHP.

 

CML

MPC is performed by reducing the riser level in steps when the cement slurry goes up the annulus.

Have a look at this webinar: EC-Drill® - MPC and Open Hole Gravel Packing

Completion

CCS

CCS is not used for completion operations.

 

SBP

It is possible to run the completion with SBP by having a separated lower completion assembly to temporarily isolate the reservoir before running the upper completion, provided this assembly is shorter than the water depth. The assembly is then run on a DP with float valves compatible with the completion deployment.

For open hole gravel pack operations, a lower density completion fluid can be used and then gradually reducing the backpressure to prevent losses when the gravel laden fluid is pumped across the screens.

 

CML

While running the completion the riser level is adjusted to maintain the BHP.

In open hole gravel pack operations, the riser level is reduced in steps to prevent losses when the gravel laden fluid is pumped across the screens.

Case study: EC-Drill® enables gravel packing without inducing losses 

Enhanced Drilling engineer in safety gear holding a device outside the workshop.

OTHER EVENTS

This section highlights a few contingency events and operations which does not apply for all wells.

Losses

CCS

In case of losses the flowrate can be reduced. Drilling may continue with reduced flowrate if the losses subsided.

 

SBP

In case of losses the flowrate can be reduced. Drilling may continue with reduced flowrate if the losses subsided. For wells at high risk of losses, pre-planning with lower density fluids and increased back pressure is recommended. The applied back pressure can then be adjusted if losses are encountered.

 

CML

In case of losses the riser level is lowered to stop the losses. Drilling may continue with the same parameters as before if the losses subsided.


Customer success story: How the EC-Drill® enabled gravel packing without inducing losses. 

Differential sticking

CCS

CCS is not used for stuck pipe situations.

 

SBP

SBP can be used to free stuck pipe by displacing the well to a lower
density fluid and then reduce the applied backpressure.

 

CML

CML can be used to free stuck pipe by lowering the riser level.

Determining actual conditions

CCS

Theoretically, CCS can be used to perform Dynamic Formation Integrity Test (DFIT) and Dynamic Pore Pressure Test (DPPT) by increasing or reducing the flowrate in steps. When the pressure drops below actual pore pressure, the Blowout Preventer (BOP) would be closed, and conventional well control applied.

 

SBP

SBP can be used to perform DFIT and DPPT by increasing or reducing the applied backpressure in steps. When the DPPT goes below actual pore pressure, SBP can circulate out the resulting influx.

 

CML

CML can be used to perform DFIT and DPPT by increasing or reducing the riser level in steps. When the DPPT goes below actual pore pressure, the BOP would be closed, and conventional well control applied unless a riser closure device is installed.

Mud Cap Drilling

CCS

CCS is not used for Mud Cap Drilling.

 

SBP

SBP can be used for Pressurized Mud Cap Drilling (PMCD). Initially, the annulus is displaced to a Light Annular Mud (LAM). The well is monitored and controlled with annular pressure readings and surface choke. The well is kept overbalanced through intermittent injections (bullheading). When pulling out a gunk pill is commonly spotted, and the well is capped above it with a heavy density fluid. Installing the RCD when running casing or liner can pose a challenge.

 

CML

CML can be used for Controlled Mud Cap Drilling (CMCD) without requiring displacements. The well is monitored and controlled with riser pressure readings and the Surface Pump Module (SPM). The well is kept overbalanced by the top-fill and boost pump continuously running and exceeding the injection rate. The excess fluid goes back to the rig. CMCD makes it easy to control and monitor the well regardless of casing or liner size – or when there is no pipe in the well.

Wireline operations

CCS

CCS is not applicable for wireline operations.

 

SBP

SBP can be used for wireline operations by first installing an adaptor into
the RCD and using a lower density fluid in the well.

 

CML

CML can be used for wireline operations.

Engineer reviewing 3D model of subsea equipment on a computer screen.

Well control

This section provides an overview of detection and monitoring capabilities for each system, together with their ability of performing Influx Management.

Well Monitoring and EKLD

CCS

With non-stop circulation, it is easier to monitor the well because there are no volume changes in the flowline. The mass-flow meter also receives a constant flow providing Early Kick and Loss Detection (EKLD), and accurate readings in single phase return flow.

 

SBP

SBP uses a mass-flow meter for EKLD providing accurate readings in single phase return flow. During non-circulating events, fluid is circulated on the surface through the mass-flow meter to maintain EKLD capabilities.

 

CML

CML uses the pressure sensors subsea in the riser for improved EKLD. The riser can be added as an active pit, with direct measurements on the well during non-circulating events. By keeping the riser level below the telescopic joint, uncertainties such as flowline volume and rig motion are eliminated making the readings even more accurate and reliable.

 

Case Study: EC-Drill® Instant Kick Detection Demonstrated on Deepwater Well

Influx management

CCS

CCS relies on conventional well control.

 

SBP

SBP can manage and circulate out an influx up to a predefined size. It can also address Riser Gas Handling.

Read more: Learn how EC-Drill® Dual MPD supports influx management 

 

CML

CML relies on conventional well control unless operated together with a riser closure device.

Footprint

CCS

CCS has a small footprint, requiring a hose on the rig floor to be connected during connections.

 

SBP

SBP has a large footprint, requiring a choke manifold, buffer manifold and occasionally a junk catcher plus other minor parts and lines.

 

CML

CML has a medium footprint, as the main component is placed subsea. Requires a Launch and Recovery System (LARS) in the moonpool area.

Enhanced Drilling engineer in orange coveralls entering a workshop with a smile.

RIG TIME

Rig time efficiency is a key factor when evaluating MPD systems. While MPD can improve drilling performance, different systems may introduce additional operational steps or equipment requirements. 

 

CCS

CCS requires minimal rig-up time. During drilling operations, the hose needs to be connected and disconnected to and from the sub on the stand during connections. It is necessary to displace the well between drilling fluid density and tripping fluid density.

 

SBP

SBP has a more extensive rigging process involving the setup of the annular and RCD along with flowlines, bleed-off lines, and umbilicals. before commencing operations, testing and fingerprinting is needed. The RCD must be run and retrieved every trip. During drilling operations, the mud pumps are ramped down and up during connections while backpressure is adjusted. It is necessary to displace the well between a drilling fluid density and a tripping fluid density. The displacements and running in hole in a heavy density fluid are particularly time consuming in a narrow operating window. If using Managed Pressure Cementing (MPC), additional time is required for displacing out the tripping fluid to a cementing fluid due to the narrow annulus caused by the liner in the hole.

An alternative to displacing to trip fluid can in some instances (see Tripping Out and Run in Hole sections) be stripping out at reduce speed instead. However, frequent stripping leads to more frequent retrievals and deployments of the RCD to change seals.

 

CML

CML typically requires a couple of hours to install the SPM before commencing operations. During drilling operations, the mud pumps are ramped down and up during connections while the riser level is adjusted.

Tripping operations are optimized without requiring displacements. MPC operations are faster by enabling higher flowrates when conditioning the fluid in a narrow annulus.

Summary

CCS, SBP and CML each offer unique advantages depending on the well design, drilling environment and operational objectives.

  • CCS offers simplicity and stable circulation.

  • SBP provides strong capabilities for influx management and well control.

  • CML offers operational flexibility, improved monitoring and the ability to benefit from the dual gradient effect, which can simplify well design in deepwater wells.

Understanding these differences helps drilling engineers select the most suitable MPD method for their specific well conditions.

Explore EC-Drill® Dual MPD

Read the EC-Drill® Dual MPD FAQs

Want to explore advanced MPD solutions?

Enhanced Drilling has developed technologies that build on the advantages of Controlled Mud Level and dual gradient drilling to improve well control, monitoring and operational efficiency.

If you would like to discuss how these technologies can support your drilling operations, get in touch with our team.

Fill out the form and I'll get back to you.

SnorreLutnes_ny-1